Search Results for: inspector general

Dan Epstein on Townhall.com: Is GSA Just the Tip of the Iceberg?

Is GSA Just the Tip of the Iceberg?

Townhall.com

By Dan Epstein

This week’s hearings on the General Services Administration (GSA) spending scandal may be ruffling some feathers, but regardless of how the event is painted by either side, the truth is that we have yet another case of severe tax-dollar waste within an administration, who, time after time, has lauded transparency and accountability. This particular GSA atrocity was concealed for over a year. Can we help but wonder about similar instances of excess that fly under the OIG radar at other agencies?

This is why Cause of Action wrote letters to 32 federal agency offices demanding information on their spending on nonessential items that offer no value to taxpayers. Among last week’s disclosures, it was revealed that GSA spent $6,325 on commemorative coins in velvet boxes for employees at the controversial Las Vegas conference. Excessive spending on trinkets like these is not only frivolous but deceptive, prompting Cause of Action to send a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to each of 32 agencies and their Offices of Inspector General calling for documentation of all spending on commemorative awards such as coins and keychains.

Jeff Neely, the Regional Commissioner of Region 9 of the GSA, refused to testify before Monday’s House Oversight Committee hearing. In response to several questions from Chairman Darrell Issa, Neely claimed, “Mr. Chairman, on the advice of my counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my 5th amendment constitutional privilege.” Inspector General Brian D. Miller claimed at the April 16, 2012 hearing that the excess spending at Region 9 was widespread. IG Miller claimed there are ongoing investigations “including all sorts of improprieties including bribes and possibly kickbacks.” IG Miller claimed GSA employees were afraid of retaliation; according to Miller, Jeff Neely “squashed” agency whistleblowers “like a bug” yet received a performance bonus for his work.

If our tax dollars are being used to purchase excessive rewards for gov

ernment employees while taxpayers themselves are struggling with mortgage payments, we want to uncover those facts.

As taxpayers, our rightful expectation is that the government is a responsible steward of our well-earned dollars and that our taxes are put toward projects that hold value for American citizens. If there are hidden line items within federal agency budgets that allocate dollars toward objects of no worth to taxpayers, Cause of Action intends to find out through FOIA, especially if this culture of noncompliance suppresses the rights of federal employees to expose fraud.

The Obama administration itself claims that FOIA is “an integral part of creating an open and transparent government,” and Cause of Action is no stranger to FOIA’s intricacies. Last fall, Cause of Action filed a FOIA request into the issue of administrative earmarks. When the Office of Management and Budget failed to present the requested information, Cause of Action took the White House to court.

The GSA case shows that tax-dollar waste comes with serious consequences. Thus far, eight GSA employees have faced serious discipline, been fired, or chosen to resign. Flippant spending is not to be taken lightly.

Acting GSA chief Dan Tangherlini has said that the GSA is now conducting an evaluation of its conferences, reviewing how dollars are used, and pinpointing methods for using resources more efficiently. But shouldn’t this be common practice for a federal agency? If GSA spent over $800,000 with practically no accountability, who’s to say that such extravagance isn’t pervasive below the surface of other federal entities?

This week, Cause of Action sent both a FOIA request for all records concerning the Office of Government Ethics’ (OGE) investigations into excessive spending on commemorative items by federal agencies as well as an investigation by the OGE into such excessive spending.

It should not take a scandal to motivate a department to streamline its spending practices, and it is disappointing that this administration needs constant reminding of its obligation to be transparent with taxpayers.

Our country is sitting under a government that can’t balance a budget and within an economy that’s facing a recession. If there was ever a time to reveal wasteful government spending and demand that this administration live up to its claims to transparency, it is now.

zp8497586rq

Citing CoA Findings, Rep. Kline Calls for Investigation into NLRB Communications on Boeing

Citing emails uncovered by Cause of Action through FOIA, on Friday, April 13, Rep. John Kline (R-MN) sent a letter to David Berry, the Inspector General at the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) requesting an investigation into Acting Counsel Lafe Solomon at the NLRB for potential ex parte communications.  Rep. Kline calls for the IG to look into communications between Lafe Sol

omon and then-Chairman Wilma Liebman concerning the Board’s case against Boeing, which have been previously brought to light by Cause of Action.

Read Rep. Kline’s letter here.

See related items from Cause of Action here.

zp8497586rq

Coin for Coins: Cause of Action Demands Agencies Reveal Wasteful Spending on Commemorative Items

Learn More

The Hill: GSA fallout: Watchdog group probes 28 federal agencies for wasteful spending

Read the full story here. The Hill

“Cause of Action, a government accountability watchdog group, has filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to 28 federal agencies seeking any evidence that they used taxpayer dollars to buy commemorative awards.

The group’s request followed this week’s report from the General Services Administration’s Inspector General, which found that GSA spent more than $800,000 on a lavish conference in Las Vegas. That report prompted GSA Administrator Martha Johnson to resign.

Cause of Action’s FOIA request notes that GSA spent $6,325 on commemorative coins that were not permissible awards to conference attendees, and asks each of the 28 agencies to detail if they too spent money on these types of awards. “Our economy is facing a recession, our government can’t pass a budget, and federal agencies http://goexback.com/ how to get your ex backare choosing to spend taxpayer dollars on trinkets for their employees or third parties,” Cause of Action Executive Director Dan Epstein said. “Instead of preserving our tax dollars for necessary spending, these agencies have traded coin for coins that hold no value. This is yet another example of frivolous and wasteful government spending that deserves to be exposed.”

zp8497586rq

Cause of Action to DOJ: Are Taxpayer Dollars Being Used to Lobby for Taxes and Legislation?

 

In a letter to the Department of Justice submitted on March 16, 2012, Cause of Action requests an investigation into a grant program through the CDC called Communities Putting Prevention to Work (CPPW) aimed at anti-tobacco and anti-obesity initiatives. Cause of Action investigators uncovered multiple instances where these grants may have actually been used for lobbying on tobacco and obesity legislation.

In October, 2011, CoA sent a letter to the Inspector General at the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) requesting an investigation into the CPPW program. In February, CoA sent letters to 20 grant recipients citing potential violations of lobbying laws based on their reports of how the CPPW grant monies were either being used or were to be used. Since HHS has failed to respond to CoA’s request for investigation, we submitted a letter to the DOJ asking them to look into how these taxpayer dollars are actually being used.

See the letter here.

 

 

CoA Requests National Labor Relations Board OIG to Investigate

Learn More

Did You Know You Paid To Lobby For More Taxes?

Cause of Action Investigates

Cause of Action has discovered that Stimulus grants have been improperly used to lobby for soda taxes and smoke-free ordinances. The grant program, titled Communities Putting Prevention to Work, is administered by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and was designed to help state and local governments educate citizens on preventing obesity and excessive tobacco use. However, documents reveal that these grants have been used to persuade state and local representatives to vote in favor of soda taxes and anti-smoking laws.

Use of discretionary grants for lobbying is prohibited by federal law. Because of the gravity of the abuse, Freedom Through Justice has requested, in writing, that the offices of the Inspector General of Health and Human Services and the Recovery Act Transparency and Accountability Board open a full investigation into which grantees have used stimulus funds to engage in improper lobbying.

Regarding these violations, Executive Director Dan Epstein stated, “We hope that their offices will treat this revelation with the seriousness it deserves. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was intended to boost jobs and get the economy working again, not fill the pockets of well-connected lobbyists in the name of nanny-state politics.”

Cause of Action will continue to investigate how and when federal funds were used to lobby for taxes most Americans oppose.