Stewart Baker: The 2014 Privies

Read the full story:  Stewart Baker

c.  FTC v. LabMD (Federal Trade Commission)
Stupid Mistake + Media Coverage = Unfair Practice

 
When LabMD set up security for its network, it didn’t expect a rogue employee to poke holes in its security by running Limewire, a program notorious for sharing pirated music — as well as any business or personal records that happen to be on the same network. And it certainly didn’t expect a complaint from the Federal Trade Commission when Limewire shared a spreadsheet with customer data.

 
There’s no doubt that LabMD made a mistake, and a bad one. But the Federal Trade Commission isn’t empowered to correct every mistake made by American businesses.  It only has authority to charge companies that have committed “unfair practices.”  What LabMD did may have been dumb; it may have been sloppy; but you’ve got to strain pretty hard to call it an unfair practice.  The FTC has been trying for years to become America’s privacy and security enforcer.  For just as long, Congress has refused to give it that role.

 
You have to admire an agency with the cojones to argue that it can make up its own legal authority as well as the offenses that it chooses to punish.  Maybe if you look closely at the seal, you can see the agency’s true motto:  “Whatever It Takes:  Finding Ways To Punish Companies Criticized by the New York Times Since 1914.”

Statement: Cause of Action on Mayorkas’ Pending Deputy Secretary Nomination

Cause of Action, a government accountability group, sent a letter to Chairman Darrell Issa of the House Committee on Oversight and Government reform urging the committee to examine the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (USCIS) oversight of the EB-5 visa Pilot Program. Cause of Action issued the following statement in response to the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee pending nomination for Alejandro Mayorkas for Deputy Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) :

Executive Director Dan Epstein:

“Just this week, Cause of Action sent a letter to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform urging the Committee to examine the USCIS’ administration of the EB-5 visa Pilot Program, which is under the oversight of Alejandro Mayorkas. Whistleblowers revealed that Mayorkas fast-tracked visa applications through the EB-5 program, which is being used to finance crony companies while failing to deliver on job creation.  In light of these concerns and the current DHS OIG investigation of Mayorkas, it was irresponsible for the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee to vote on Mayorkas’ nomination for Deputy Secretary of the DHS before DHS’s internal investigation is complete.”

Report: Forest City Enterprises Profits Despite Legal Violations

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                                                                                 

CONTACT:      

Jamie Morris, 202-499-2425

 

Report: Forest City Enterprises Profits Despite Legal Violations

Cause of Action calls on Congress to investigate Forest City Enterprises and lax oversight at USCIS, DOJ 

WASHINGTON –Cause of Action (CoA), a government accountability organization, today released “Unfair Enrichment: How Forest City Enterprises Acts Above the Law,” the third and final installment of the three-part investigation, “Political Profiteering: How Forest City Enterprises Makes Private Profits at the Expense of America’s Taxpayers,” exposing how New York State manipulated census data to benefit Forest City Enterprises’ (FCE) New York subsidiary Forest City Ratner (FCR) and the New York City Regional Center (NYCRC).  With this data, FCR and the NYCRC enticed foreign investors into a cash-for-visas program, all while downplaying the risk of investment and exaggerating job creation predictions.  Further, the Department of Justice (DOJ) failed to prosecute FCR executives who bribed city council members to approve another FCR development in project in Yonkers, N.Y.

CoA’s nearly two-year investigation found that executives of FCR played illicit roles in the 2005-2006 bribery scandal that resulted in the federal conviction of two local politicians in Yonkers, N.Y. for securing approval for FCR’s Ridge Hill development project.  The DOJ failed to prosecute, despite being alerted by a 2010 letter from Ranking Member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Darrell Issa (R-CA) and Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee Lamar Smith (R-TX) that raised concerns that “political favoritism” guided the DOJ’s decision “not to pursue legal charges against Forest City Ratner and its employees.”

Dan Epstein, Cause of Action’s executive director commented:

“Our investigation uncovered that not only did FCR violate the law and engage in political profiteering, but the DOJ turned a blind eye to FCR’s criminal activity while the USCIS failed to hold New York State accountable. We can’t rely on these federal agencies to properly apply their own rules and protect the interests of taxpayers, which is why Congress should intervene and investigate these practices.”

Findings from the report include:

  • The New York Department of Labor (NYDOL) and the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) manipulated census data in order to create a “targeted employment area” (TEA) for the New York City Regional Center (NYRC) and FCR in violation of U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) regulations.
  • FCR and NYRC, with the cooperation of New York state elected officials, misleadingly advertised the Atlantic Yards Project to potential investors by keeping the actual purpose of EB-5 funding ambiguous and exaggerating job creation predictions.  EB-5 investors were also misled as to the risk of their investing in the Atlantic Yards project—a potential Federal securities violation.
  • The DOJ failed to prosecute FCR executives who bribed Yonkers City Council Member Sandi Annabi.  FCR executives covered up payments to Yonkers Republican Party Chairman Zehy Jereis under the guise of a consulting contract for “retail hunting” in order to protect themselves from federal criminal liability when, in fact, Jereis’s consulting contract was in exchange for Annabi’s vote approving FCR’s Ridge Hill Project.
  • FCE defended and benefited from eminent domain seizures for private development in California and New York, and spent a combined $350,000 on California ballot initiatives in 2006 and 2008 to back sweeping eminent domain measures to benefit private developers.

In light of these findings, CoA wrote to Chairman Issa of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee urging the committee to examine USCUS’ treatment of states’ TEA designations and determine whether undue political influence affected DOJ’s decision not to prosecute FCE.

To access our letter, click here

To access Unfair Enrichment: How Forest City Enterprises Acts Above the Law, click here.

To access parts one and two of the investigation, click here.

About Cause of Action:

Cause of Action is a non-profit, nonpartisan government accountability organization that fights to protect economic opportunity when federal regulations, spending and cronyism threaten it. For more information, visit www.causeofaction.org.  

To schedule an interview with Cause of Action’s Executive Director Dan Epstein, contact Mary Beth Hutchins,  202-400-2721 or Jamie Morris, jamie.morris@causeofaction.org.

###

Cause of Action Statement on Federal Trade Commission’s Request for More Authority

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Kevin Schmidt, 202-499-2414

kevin.schmidt@causeofaction.org

Cause of Action Statement on Federal Trade Commission’s Request for More Authority

WASHINGTON – Cause of Action (CoA), a government accountability organization, issued the following statement from Senior VP of Litigation Reed Rubinstein regarding the Federal Trade Commission’s request for Congress to pass legislation expanding the commission’s oversight and jurisdiction:

“For decades the FTC has been asking Congress for more authority and when denied the expanded jurisdiction, they choose to act anyway, defying lawmakers. The agency has shown a propensity to engage in burdensome and malicious investigations, including their most recent actions against LabMD involving data security, despite the fact Congress denied their request in 2000 and has never approved it.”

CoA is also defending LabMD against a complaint brought by the FTC based, in part, on allegations that a third party was able to obtain data from LabMD’s computers through the peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing program LimeWire. LabMD argues that the FTC lacks the authority to regulate patient-information. The FTC has attacked LabMD without publishing any data-security regulations or standards and with the knowledge that LabMD’s data security practices are regulated by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).  HHS has never suggested that LabMD violated any patient information data-security regulations or requirements.

Last month, CoA filed a Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, on behalf of LabMD, seeking to stop the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) extralegal abuse of government power.

The lawsuit along with the previous filings on behalf of LabMD, can be found here.

About Cause of Action:

Cause of Action is a non-profit, nonpartisan government accountability organization that fights to protect economic opportunity when federal regulations, spending and cronyism threaten it. For more information, visit www.causeofaction.org.

About LabMD:

LabMD is a cancer detection facility that specializes in analysis and diagnosis of blood, urine, and tissue specimens for cancers, micro-organisms and tumor markers. You can find out more about their battle with the FTC here.

 

To schedule an interview with Cause of Action’s Executive Director Dan Epstein, contact Kevin Schmidt, kevin.schmidt@causeofaction.org

Statement: Cause of Action fights for transparency, pushes back against Judicial, Legislative & Executive Branch

The federal government does not want the American people to know what caused the financial crisis.  Cause of Action believes Americans have a right to know what their government is up to and, through the Freedom of Information Act, sought to access the records of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, currently held at the National Archives.  In our battle with the National Archives, we have been opposed by all three branches of the federal government: the Executive (through the Archives), the Judicial (via the trial court), and the Legislative (through the House leadership’s decision to oppose Cause of Action’s lawsuit).  ‘The most transparent administration in American history’ does not believe that the public has a right to know just what caused our nation’s most significant financial crisis since the Great Depression.  Cause of Action is committed to pursuing the release of these documents and holding the government accountable for blocking our access.

We filed our Reply Brief in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on December 4, 2013.

Click here to see all of the related documents.

Dan Epstein on WIBA-AM Upfront w/ Vicki McKenna 11/22/2013

Executive Director Dan Epstein discussing the CPSC’s targeting of Buckyballs.

Dan Epstein on WIBA-AM Upfront w/ Vicki McKenna 11/22/2013

Executive Director Dan Epstein discussing Enroll America.