The Blaze: Officials to Cough Up Documents That Could Show the IRS Gave Private Taxpayer Data to the White House

Read the full story: The Blaze

But TIGTA never released a report, and that prompted the group Cause of Action to file a Freedom of Information Act request to see the result of its work. TIGTA refused to even confirm its investigation, but in September, a judge said TIGTA officials had to comply with the request from Cause of Action.

 

Cause of Action said Tuesday that it expects to receive up to 2,500 separate documents that could show improper links between the White House and the IRS, and that it expects to receive those documents by mid-December.

 

“This disclosure, coming only after Cause of Action sued TIGTA over its refusal to acknowledge whether such investigations took place, and after the Court ordered TIGTA to reveal whether or not documents existed, signals that the White House may have made significant efforts to obtain taxpayers’ personal information,” the group said.

Washington Examiner: Treasury: 2,500 documents ‘potentially’ show IRS sharing taxpayer data with White House

Read the full story: Washington Examiner

In a shocking revelation, the Treasury Inspector General has identified some 2,500 documents that “potentially” show taxpayer information held by the Internal Revenue Service being shared with President Obama’s White House.

 

The discovery was revealed to the group Cause of Action, which has sued for access to any of the documents. It charges that the IRS and White House have harassed taxpayers.

 

In an email from the Justice Department’s tax office, an official revealed the high number of documents, suggesting that the White House was hip deep in probes of taxpayers, likely including conservatives and Tea Party groups associated with the IRS scandal.

Law360: Tiversa Can’t Attack Future Witness In LabMD Fight With FTC

Read the full story: Law360

The order pointed out that the judge had already rejected a motion by the FTC in July for permission to develop evidence to rebut Wallace’s expected testimony because he had yet to testify, and that Tiversa’s “attempt at anticipatory rebuttal” suffered from a similar defect.

 

Cause of Action, which is representing LabMD in the administrative proceeding, praised the administrative law judge’s decision to disregard Tiversa’s notice.

 

“All along we’ve wanted the truth to come out about the FTC’s actions against LabMD,” Cause of Action said in a statement provided to Law360 on Thursday.

Dan Epstein on the Lars Larson Show 11/21/2014

Washington Examiner: FOIA advocates disagree on timing of reform measure moving through Senate

Read the full story: Washington Examiner

A bill now moving through the Senate is intended to improve how federal agencies respond to Freedom of Information Act requests for information from journalists, businesses and citizens. Some FOIA advocates are happier about that than others.

 

“The FOIA Improvement Act sets limits on the ability of agencies to stonewall requesters, which is why the Senate Judiciary’s approval is a move in the right direction for all who have an interest in a more transparent federal government,” said Cause of Action Executive Director Dan Epstein.

 

“As a watchdog group working on behalf of taxpayers, we support steps to establish greater accountability for agencies that currently hinder government transparency through FOIA,” Epstein said.

 

Cause of Action is a nonprofit advocacy group that works for greater transparency and accountability in government.

The Hill: Senate Judiciary approves FOIA reform

Read the full story:  The Hill

The bill would also make more documents available online and would expand a program that requires agencies to post records regularly used by the public. It would also clarify that individuals cannot be charged for information that was handed over late.

 

“The FOIA Improvement Act sets limits on the ability of agencies to stonewall requesters, which is why the Senate Judiciary’s approval is a move in the right direction for all who have an interest in a more transparent federal government,” said Dan Epstein, executive director of Cause of Action.

National Law Journal: Post-Enron Law Snags Fisherman

Read the full story: National Law Journal

To bolster their conflicting arguments, each side engages in a classic battle of statutory interpretation. They turn to the dictionary for the ordinary meaning of “tangible object.” They fight over such canons of interpretation as “noscitur a sociis” and “ejusdem generis” with citations to a book by Justice Antonin Scalia and Bryan Garner. They look to the legislative history of Sarbanes-Oxley and they argue over Congress’ intent.

 

Yates finds support in briefs from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the Cato Institute, Pacific Legal Foundation, Cause of Action, former U.S. Rep. Michael Oxley of Ohio and 18 criminal law professors. They stress the overcriminalization issue, the lack of fair warning to Yates and others that their actions could bring criminal liability, and the canons of statutory interpretation.