Archives for March 2015

National Review: Hillary’s System Probably Let Obama’s E-Mails Get Hacked. Probably.

Read the full story: National Review

Meanwhile, the government accountability group Cause of Action made three new FOIA requests regarding HRC’s email use. One is being sent to the State Department’s Inspector General, asking for all documents relating to any review, audit or investigation, whether merely considered, ongoing or completed, concerning Secretary’s Clinton’s compliance with electronic recordkeeping requirements and use of personal devices for agency business. The group is also asking for “All documents, including but not limited to electronic communications, including any person at the White House, the U.S. Department of State, the Clinton Family Foundation, and the Clinton Foundation, referring or relating to any document in the request above.” A spokesman for Cause of Action writes, “It’s clear that the White House, including President Obama, knew Secretary Clinton was using a non-government email address. The key question we’re asking is, did the White House ever do anything about it?”

 

FOIA Requests Re: Hillary Clinton Emails

See FOIA requests sent by Cause of Action to the National Archives and Records Administration, U.S. Department of State Office of Inspector General, and U.S. Department of State below:

 

 

Washington Times: Hillary’s Watergate

Read the full story: Washington Times 

It is hard to imagine the 2016 presidential race without Hillary Clinton.

 

But Mrs. Clinton seems to have missed the most important lesson that everyone else learned from the Watergate scandal: The cover up is worse than the crime.

 

“The Federal Records Act requires that an agency head preserves a record. It also requires that if records were unlawfully removed, defaced or destroyed that the agency head notify the archivist at the National Archives. In this case, Mrs. Clinton should have notified the head archivist that she had in her possession, official agency records,” said Daniel Epstein, executive director of Washington transparency group Cause of Action.

 

Mrs. Clinton may have also been in violation of national security laws if any of her emails contained classified information.

CQ Researcher: Presidential Power

Read the full report: CQ Researcher 

Dan Epstein, executive director of the civic watchdog group Cause of Action, says Obama has “politicized the bureaucracy” by dictating agency actions. In August 2014, the group sued the Obama administration, alleging that white House attorneys interfere with the release of public documents in violation of the freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The practice is based on an April 15, 2009, white House memo directing general counsels at all executive agencies and departments to consult with white House counsel before complying with FOIA requests.

 

Epstein says the memo “allowed the white House to assert more control over the ways agencies control docu- ments that let the public know what the government is up to. It has chilled democracy, and done so in ways that have gone unchecked by Congress and the courts.” As a result, he says, agencies “are following laws dictated by the president rather than laws dictated by the people.”

Law360: Nonprofit Asks 7th Circ. To Revive FCA Chicago Transit Suit

Read the full story here: Law360

A government watchdog asked the Seventh Circuit on Wednesday to revive its False Claims Act suit against the Chicago Transit Authority for overbilling the government up to $55 million for bus usage, saying the nonprofit brought original, nonpublic information in the case.

 

Cause of Action, a Washington-based public interest group, said it was the first to blow the whistle on CTA for its allegedly fraudulent billing of the Federal Transit Administration for miles its buses traveled when they were not in service. U.S. District Judge Robert M. Dow Jr. dismissed the suit in October, saying the group’s accusations were “substantially the same” as some that had been published elsewhere. But Cause of Action said Wednesday its 2012 complaint went further than the two earlier allegations, neither of which was made public.

IJ Review: 3 Federal Laws Hillary May Have Violated By Using Personal Email Accounts for State Business

Read the full story: IJ Review

Supporters of Hillary Clinton continue to ask the equivalent of ‘What difference does it make?’ with regard to the former Secretary of State’s use of a personal email account to conduct official State Department business.

 

Meanwhile, many investigative reporters are combing through federal rules and regulations to discover what criminal charges Clinton could face for her actions.

 

Executive Order 13526 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 793(f) of the federal code make it unlawful to send of store classified information on personal email. Casey Harper at The Daily Caller delved into this angle:

 

“‘By using a private email system, Secretary Clinton violated the Federal Records Act and the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual regarding records management, and worse, could have left classified and top secret documents vulnerable to cyber attack,’ Cause of Action Executive Director Dan Epstein said in an email to reporters.

 

‘This is an egregious violation of the law, and if it were anyone else, they could be facing fines and criminal prosecution.’”

Government Executive: GOP Tax Panel Chairmen Press for White House Emails in IRS Probe

Read the full story: Government Executive

In a coordinated effort between House and Senate Republicans, the chairmen of the two tax committees on Wednesday asked the Internal Revenue Service commissioner for emails and other documents that might indicate sharing of private taxpayer information between the Internal Revenue Service and the White House.

 

House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, cited an earlier White House “refusal” to respond in a March 4 letter to IRS Commissioner John Koskinen.

 

The notion that White House officials looked at private taxpayer returns is also at the heart of an ongoing legal battle between the nonprofit transparency group Cause of Action and the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.